Tires OEM Toyota or MRF

I had Bridgestone B250 165/80 R14 as stock on my Ritz 2011, those were very bad at braking performance, and didn\u2019t provide any kind of comfort at all, even the underbody touched a few speed breakers when the car was fully loaded. But then I switched to MRF ZLX 185/70 R14 tyres and those were in a league of their own, great braking, comfort and much less body roll.

Same in my Nexon, so far the tyres have been good. One tyre had a sidewall puncture after 28k kms. Replaced it with the same. The rest of them are running without zero punctures in 37.6k kms, and have seen all kinds of terrains. I'm quite satisfied with the performance.

Hey guys, Thanks to you guys, I got it checked on time through MRF FAAST and got a replacement for less than half the price of new tyre.

Find an MRF FASST service centre if you have around you.

Go there and and get this replaced, they will provide a newly manufactured same tire, and will charge you for tire depriciation of the old one.

Had the same exact thing at 1 year with MRF Tyre, went to MRF and claimed warranty, they replaced with a new one and took the old one based on tyre tread left and condition. I paid only 2k for a 17 inch tyre.

These are the common issues in MRF APOLLO AND CEAT.

These kind of bulging cause bursting on high speed.

Usually should have ideally clocked 40K. But MRF is like that. I changed mine only after 20K after side wall cut and moved to YOKOHAMA Geolander H/T.

Mine was mrf and did not have a good experience. Within 1 month 4k km run tire burst in a simple pot hole with 33 psi air pressure

Nothing new for the MRF wanderers skoda gives on their cars.

Faced this on 3 tyres at once and one even blasted suddenly when on a Highway doing 120, fed up with issues i constantly faced with these tyres and changed them all at once to continentals

Not MRF. We have a six hour proddie car race at Bathurst sponsored by them and I never met anyone who drove on them say anything good about MRF