Tires OEM FORD or MRF

OEM FORD Tires

There's some evidence that EVs are harder on tires because they're heavier and accelerate better, but at 10k on my very, very heavy Lightning I'm not seeing that, probably because I drive like a grandma.

Pros: regenerative braking minimizing wear
Cons: heavier, accelerate better
Vehicle: Ford
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM FORD Tires

I'll add my first two years of ownership review. The past two years the Maverick has hauled everything I've needed without issues.

Pros: fuel economy, seat comfort
Cons: cheap plastic interior, wind noise
Mileage: 45550 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM FORD Tires

Here\u2019s the \u201cbad\u201d stuff that I\u2019ve had on mine:\n\n- LED light on the running board went out. Replaced under warranty\n- backup sensor issue: a wire broke (i think) when I did some \u201cspirited\u201d driving on a gravel road. Getting fixed on Monday.\n- rear drive unit seal weeped a bit. Getting fixed on Monday.\n- stock tires sucked.

Cons: stock tires sucked
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires
Additional-Tap-5795
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Last week I got a flat tyre on my back from the office and found that this tyre on my 2-month-old Suzuki Fronx (Aug 2025 model) is no more usable. Found a chipped off thread grip on the driver's side tyre, which resulted in low pressure. Due to driving at that pressure, the side liner developed cracks, losing its pressure holding capacity. Commonly, it is a clear case of prolonged low-pressure driving. However, in my case, since the tyre always looked low on pressure, I made sure to check the tyre pressure at every gas station while refueling. Now I am running on a spare tyre and wondering if I should go for the same tyre (MRF Wanderer 195/60 R16) or another brand.

Pros: tyre looked low on pressure
Cons: chipped off thread grip, side liner cracks
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Same issue on my Taigun. Those mrfs are bad. The showroom and mrf said that it was due to impact damage and refused to replace initially.

Cons: bad quality, warranty refusal
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...