Tires Nokia or MRF

Nokia Tires

Am avut o masina inchiriata cu Nokian Hakkapelita in Suedia pe zapada, s-au comportat exemplar.

Pros: comportament exemplar pe zăpadă
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Eu am avut 6 ani la rand Nokian wr snowprof , schimbate o data la 2 ierni, s-au comportat foarte ok, atat pe zapada, polei, ud sau uscat

Pros: performanță bună pe zăpadă, bună pe polei, bună pe ud/uscat
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I also use MRF tyres and mine are running solid for 4+ years. I had 2-3 pinhole punctures which were all repaired eith that mushroom like thing.

Pros: running solid, long lifespan
Cons: minor punctures
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian hakkapeliittas are great - my #1 pick. Blizzaks good to great and much cheaper. No complaints with the Blizzaks, but I just had the impression with the Hakkas that they were another level - really surprisingly good in the worst conditions.

Pros: surprisingly good in conditions
Cons: Blizzaks much cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I’m a fan of Nokian brand. Finland knows snow and it shows in their tires. I’ve been using them for years and love having dedicated snow tires. After I had been using them for about 5 years, I talked my wife into getting a set for her car. She was mad I hadn’t talked her into it sooner.

Pros: dedicated snow tires, night and day difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Looks like I made it to about 38,000 miles on these Nokian One Tires and starting to show the cord.

Pros: lasted two rough years
Cons: starting to show cord
Mileage: 38000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 76

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...