Tires NITTO or Kumho

Kumho Tires
youthavenger
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had the Kumho on my Fx45 before the current Kooks. Overall, I prefer the Hankooks since I feel the ride better, quieter, etc (maybe I am just getting old and need to trade in for an ES300). Plus the Hankooks come with tread warranty, no? The Kumho were a bit stickier but I felt they wore a bit prematurely.

Pros: ride better, quieter
Cons: wore a bit prematurely
Vehicle: Infiniti
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
tjdeerslayer37
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I've got a bit over 7000 miles on them and I have the same impressions. I really enjoy these tires. Quiet, sticky, great wet traction and dry. Very very happy with them.

Pros: quiet, sticky, great traction
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 7000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
Jimmyk459
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have these on my MKV R32 and love them. They are the best tires I have had on this car (previously Sumitomo HTR P01 A/S which were the LEAST durable tire ever and OEM stock dunlops) These are the most quiet, grippiest, most comfortable tires I have used.

Pros: most quiet, grippiest
Cons: least durable tire ever
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
cldub
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Damn those stretch incredibly well compared to my Nitto's These are my 205/40/18 on an 8.5

Pros: stretch incredibly well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
L33t A2
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I ran those Kumhos on the Volvo 850 Turbo I had, I liked them a lot. The only downside was being that the car was heavy, you could feel the sidewall flex in hard cornering, then again they are a sport all season and not a true summer tire so I think they fit the bill nicely.

Pros: liked them a lot, fit the bill nicely
Cons: sidewall flex in hard cornering
Vehicle: Volvo 850
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
vdub4lyf
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

I like my Kumho's 205/45/16's, I have about 15,000 mi. on them, still alot of meat. There 2 yrs. old still looks new. They cost me $125 per tire.

Pros: good treadwear, looks new
Mileage: 24140 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
VeeDee
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Just installed Motivo's on wife's 2006 S4. Really like the tires. Tires are quiet, have excellent wet weather grip and seem resistant to hydroplaning. Also the tires do not follow road seams/grooves. Thinking about putting Motivo's on my 2013 GTI.

Pros: quiet, excellent wet grip
Cons: resistant to hydroplaning
Vehicle: Audi S4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have the Kuhmo Road Venture APT KL51 235/60. I was very happy with them until I realized the fronts are shot after 20K mi. I probably ran them under inflated a bit for too long. And never rotated them =(. The taller than stock size makes zero noticeable difference on the speedo or power on the road. My speedo matches my GPS reading exactly. Clearance is no problem.

Pros: happy with them
Cons: fronts shot after 20K mi
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I bought these exact tires for my gli. I don't know what the deal is with them, but they flat out SUCK in the snow. The are by far the worst performing all season tire in terms of snow usage that I've ever run.

Cons: SUCK in the snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 77

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...