Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

MICHELIN Tires

Se fac 2 ani de cand am michelin cc2. Imi plac foarte mult. De acum incolo numai AS.

Folosite in toate conditiile.

Pros: Imi plac foarte mult
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My Michelin PSAS4s are at 6/32" and so just past mid-life after 50,000 km. I don't have anything bad to say about them; the sidewalls are just right.

Pros: sidewalls are just right
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
DTGR_trading
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Treated it with the new Michelin cross climate 3 sport wich improved handling a lot. Was a little worried about comfort but it’s not as bad as I thought.

Pros: improved handling
Cons: initial comfort concerns
Vehicle: Volvo V60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Personal, pe un Q5 cu stage 1 la 230 de cai (si o conduita preventiva) nu am avut absolut nicio problema cu Michelin CrossClimate2 atat iarna cat si vara.

Pros: nicio problema iarna si vara
Vehicle: Audi Q5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Additional_Service68
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

Michelin has god level comfort and wet braking. My honda jazz came with Michelin XM2. The problem is due to softer compound. It lasts lesser kms. I have to change mine around 35k kms.

Due to some import restrictions, I was unable to find 195 60 Michelin so asked trye shops. Almost everyone recommended Yoko for city rough road use. I use Yokohoma now and though its not as good as Michelin its defined better than MRF Bridgestone used in my relatives car.

Pros: god level comfort, wet braking
Cons: lasts lesser kms
Vehicle: Honda Jazz
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Mindless_Evidence881
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

Using the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the ride has been phenomenal until now. Amazing grip and silent too on high speeds. Just that they're quite expensive compared to other brands. Currently done 30k kms on them. Had a sidewall rupture once which fortunately got covered under warranty.

Pros: amazing grip, silent
Cons: quite expensive
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Tatyaa_Vinchuu
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

Would choose Yokahama any day, Used on Figo. Great Grip on curves even on wet road, Comfort and bit noisy on cement road, Amazing in villages/off roads.

Pros: great grip, comfort
Cons: bit noisy
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
IamVerrrryPoor
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Have yokohama earth1 on my i20, been like ~50k kms and still have enough tread for about 10k kms

So personally can vouch for it, no noise, good comfort and enough grip in it for me to take turns at 70kmph with confidence during rains.

Pros: no noise, good comfort
Vehicle: Hyundai i20
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

my only all seasons ever were Yokohama Geolandar G015. They were ok for about two years, but then the compound began to harden and I had to switch. They were decent on snow and water, but sucked on ice.

Pros: decent on snow, water
Cons: sucked on ice, compound hardened
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...