Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

Nokia Tires
Dimsheks
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Both are top tier winter tires, just Nokian being generally noisier

Pros: top tier winter tires
Cons: generally noisier
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
SweepHand
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I’ve got the Michelin X-Ice without studs. Good grip and quiet - can happily recommend them as an alternative to Nokians.

Pros: good grip, quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

You will get your monies worth with the defender 2 tires over the course of driving 100,000+ km with them versus any other none Michelin tire.

Pros: monies worth, long lasting
Mileage: 100000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
MrLazzki14
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

Michelin had a slight edge on wet and dry asphalt. Michelin wasn't far off from the Nokia on the ice and snow performance either and also wasn't making as much noise.

Pros: edge on wet asphalt, less noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian nAT Outpost tires are fantastic (for an A/T) in the snow. Not the most aggressive off road compound but even though it's not a true winter tire Nokian still knows what they're doing.

Pros: fantastic in the snow
Cons: not most aggressive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

In my experience Nokian Hakkapeliitta are good, but not as durable as Continental or Michelin.

Pros: good performance
Cons: not as durable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I will say after installing diff and subframe bushings, there is a marked difference in cold weather performance on these tires. The car likes to step out a lot more readily. With stock bushings, the difference shouldn't be that exaggerated, but there is a difference in performance on cold Pilots.

Cons: not good in cold
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...