Tires MICHELIN or NITTO

MICHELIN Tires

Michelin are great tyres and very grippy but wear quickly because they are usually a softer compound than the equivalent in other brands

Pros: great tyres, very grippy
Cons: wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had these on my 2004 RAV4 and they were pretty good/decent for an all season tire. I was traveling into Boston during a snow shower on the highway, and although I was driving really slow as well, I had decent grip/braking

Pros: decent grip/braking
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

If you’re going to pay $892 for Yokos, might as well spend a little more for the Michelin Cross Climate 2 or Michelin Defender 2. If you have minimal/light snow, the Defender2 might be better since their warranty is at 80k vs the CC2 at only 60k.

Pros: warranty is at 80k
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Got set of brand new 18" Michelin Cross Climate 2 tires with Road Force balancing and extended warranty for equivalent of 760$ (tax incl).

Pros: new tires, extended warranty
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I will say after installing diff and subframe bushings, there is a marked difference in cold weather performance on these tires. The car likes to step out a lot more readily. With stock bushings, the difference shouldn't be that exaggerated, but there is a difference in performance on cold Pilots.

Cons: not good in cold
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Had the same ones on a Crosstrek. They take the cake as my worst tires. Period. They handled worse in snow than my now Michelin Pilot Sport A/S tires, which is NOT a high bar. And only lasted 40k miles before the tread was done.

Cons: handled worse in snow
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...