Tires MICHELIN or Kumho

MICHELIN Tires
GataPapa
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I like the Michelin E.Primacy all season tires which I bought to replace the OEM Continentals. They are more efficient, ride quality is better, and noise is about equal to the OEM Continentals that came on my Model Y LR.

Pros: more efficient, better ride
Cons: slightly less grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
2snjr
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I’ve just gone from Michelin PS5s to the new Kumho PS72 and can highly recommend both. I’ll be sticking to the ps72 now as I think they’re amazing value

Pros: amazing value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

shocked no one mentioned michelin pilot sport 4S yet, those are peak performance tires. they also have good wet performance too, despite being summer tires.

Pros: peak performance tires
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I've ran both Kumho Ecsta PS71s and GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6s on my ND2.

Both pretty great.

Pros: pretty great
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I try to get safer tires, which are often performance tires. Less concerned with longevity, more concerned with emergency stopping distance. Michelin Pilot Sport AS4

Pros: safer tires
Cons: less longevity
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelin CrossClimate2. They are snow and ice rated, can be driven all year round, have good handling, and will last you 60,000 miles easily. I’m on my second set. They work well in snow and ice.

Pros: good handling, long lasting
Cons: pricier
Mileage: 96560 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
LeftTurnAtAlbuqurque
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Michelin's Cross Climate 2 is the current gold standard for All-Weather tires, are very capable and can last upwards of 40k miles.

Pros: very capable, long lasting
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
scarylawn
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I have had these tires for a little over 2 years and they have been great, but unfortunately they\u2019re needing replaced at 45,000 miles. I am a bit disappointed in that - I don\u2019t feel they wore very well and I am consistent with tire rotation/oil changes. Curious if anyone else has experienced early wear on these tires? Or is it expected to have to replace them this soon? From what I read I was expecting at least 60k miles\u2026

Pros: have been great
Cons: early wear
Mileage: 72420 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
ram_87_leo
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

Do not get this. Tire is good enough with handling but it eas worn down to 4/32 within 25k miles. Hp71 was what i had.

Pros: good enough handling
Cons: worn down quickly
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 317

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...