Tires MICHELIN or KENDA

MICHELIN Tires

I reluctantly put the A/S 3's on my Corrado 2 years ago. My preferred Nitto 555 was NLA in my size. I can honestly say that the all season Michelin is every bit the Z-rated summer only Nitto in 99% of my driving. I will be getting these again for sure. It's a can't lose tire and does live up to it's billing.

Pros: every bit the Z-rated
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
JackStraw79
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I'm not a tire snob, but I will add these to points on my current experience with the A/S 3: Great balance between handling and comfort IMO At about 21k miles of use, mine are well worn- I will likely replace these at only 25k or so. I'm curious if others have had similar experience.

Pros: great balance, handling and comfort
Cons: worn at 21k miles
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Never had the Dunlops, but I had the AS/3 on my old Avant. They were fantastic. Not a peep of tire noise and hardly any howl in corners compared to the OE Pirelli P6.

Pros: fantastic, no tire noise
Cons: howl in corners
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Dubveiser
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

The Michelin xice3 however are an absolute joy to drive on dry/wet and will handle snow/ice very well. They pretty much ride like a quality all-season. As an all-around tire the Michelin is much, much better.

Pros: joy to drive, handles snow/ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Energysavers arent so good on wet surfaces, but on normal driving I did not have any problems conserning traction. I had them at rear for 2 years. They last very long.

Pros: long lasting, normal traction
Cons: bad on wet surfaces
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...