Tires MICHELIN or FULDA

MICHELIN Tires

I only put ~8k kms / 5000 miles on them, so I can't comment on longevity. But I drove them through snow, sleet and heavy rain (winter tires), and up to 125mph on the German Autobahn, and they were just fine.

Pros: were just fine
Cons: cannot comment on longevity
Mileage: 8000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Sarionum
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I would choose Michelin AS4s over the Contis if they're available and in your price range. They offer better MPG and ride comfort over the Contis while delivering more grip in the wet and dry. Just an all around better tire, but the Conti is still great albeit a little heavier than Michelin.

Pros: better MPG, ride comfort
Cons: a little heavier
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
lilcole1
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I replaced the stock ones on my 21 (@ 35k) with Michelin CC2’s a few weeks ago. My fuel mileage went down by a few MPG but the ride is much smoother and quieter. And I tested them out in the snow and ice today. Well worth the extra money!

Pros: ride much smoother, quieter
Cons: fuel mileage went down
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelin had 2 models in the Pilot series - Sporty and Street Radial. The Street Radial was excellent, while the Indian made Sporty was horrible.

Pros: Street Radial was excellent
Cons: Sporty was horrible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Bourbon-n-cigars
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Just had my Michelin LTX (world’s ugliest tire) in for an attempted rebalance and they told me after a couple tries the same day that they’re shaped like a boiled egg cut in half. Tech did what he could but ultimately I’m getting new tires.

Cons: shaped like boiled egg
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...