Tires Kumho or Laufenn

They are great value for the price. I put them on my VW after the Bridgestone (very noisy) wore out. These have a better, quieter, luxury ride.

Nessa medida comprei para uma Leon 4 Kumho HS52, excelente pneus, já os usava noutro carro, e sem queixas.

I’ve got Kumho Tires, they have been great for 60k km. Bought online.

With innovative tech, a capable rubber compound, and a wide range of options and sizes, the upcoming Kumho's performance range is great news for all high-speed enthusiasts who are looking for dependable and affordable rubber.

I put some Kumho Crugen on my grandmas van and they were great. She did a few trips from LA to Sacramento(7 hr). No issues.

I don't know about these inparticular but I drove AT51 Kuhmos back when I had a 07 Liberty in Syracuse, NY.

I hiked and camped regularly with friends as well. Drove on trails, did moderate off-roading, heavy snow, ice, heavy rain, on top of it being my daily driver, so plenty of highway miles as well.

They lasted me 55K (rotated 4 times during ownership)

Never had a flat, great traction, great price.

I replaced mine after 27k miles and they were DONE, no thread left on any of them. 13k miles later they look very good, but I have also been rotating them (unlike the Kumho ones).

My 22 Turbo came with Laufenn tires. I never heard of them, it’s a Hankook brand.

....and I'll throw in another vote for the Continental DWS 06. Also relevant to this thread - I bought my '11 Range Rover Sport in January, and it had Laufenn tires, the cheapest option on Tire Rack in the proper size. They had plenty of tread life but they were not great - noisy, not a lot of grip in any conditions - so first excuse I had, I swapped on the Continentals, and they are substantially better at everything.

I replaced mine with about the same amount of mileage, mine also had a decent bit left when I did. The reason I replaced them is the Crugen’s terrible rain performance. They hydroplaned when brand new and never a rain storm since did they stop.