Tires Kumho or Kormoran

Kumho Tires

Been really happy with the Kumho Ecsta PA51, as they are a bit more frisky than my previous set of tires which were Conti DWS 06+… although I generally find all seasons to be disappointing.

Pros: really happy, more frisky
Cons: all seasons disappointing
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Locuiesc in Constanta si de vreo 6 ani nu mai avem ierni pline cu zapada. Maxim 2-3 zile apoi mai da cativa fulgi... Folosesc KUMHO si sunt foarte multumit. Se simte aderenta si nu am patit sa imi derapeze vreodata pe polei/zapada. Au si un aspect placut.

Pros: aderență bună, fără derapaje, aspect plăcut
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have a 25 ev9 land on kumho's. Im at 31,000km and my tires still have lots of tread. I also have a very heavy foot

Pros: lots of tread, durable
Vehicle: Kia
Mileage: 31000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The HA32 has pretty OK performance for an all-weather tire, it placed mostly in the middle of the pack in this review. Wet braking performance is a little behind the competition.

Pros: OK performance
Cons: wet braking behind
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
AnyClownFish
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Leaving aside whether or not the mechanic should have changed them, the difference in quality and performance between Kumho and Bridgestone is negligible, virtually nil.

Pros: negligible difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 44

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...