Tires Kumho or GENERAL TIRE

Kumho Tires
StinklePink
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Just bought these as I was in the market. I like them. A little more firm of a ride but not terrible. Price was right and I am KUMHO fan and that is who makes these for Discount. In summary if money is an object, good value and I would recommend.

Pros: good value, price right
Cons: more firm of a ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires
WoolyFox
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I currently have General G-Max AS-07 fitted on my Challenger. They are so far proving a good tire and handle the RWD and the car's weight well.

Pros: good tire, handles weight well
Vehicle: Dodge
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

the Kumho TA51 (assuming TA51a as it is the current production) is a well reviewed and tested very low rolling resistance tire, thanks to a silica-enhanced tread compound. Most reviewers and owners over time generally note a small INCREASE in fuel economy of 1-3 MPG.

Pros: low rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires

Ran the General G-Max As-07 and they were a great tire but still had some slippage in rain. Went with the Michelin CrossClimate 2 to replace them and have never looked back. Better tire all around.

Pros: great tire
Cons: slippage in rain
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires
mdwieland
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I can vouch for the Generals, their dry and wet traction is leagues better than the POS OEM Falkens, they're just as quiet, and treadwear is excellent. I ran 25k miles aggressively, and treadwear was minimal when I traded in my '18. I'm getting a new set of Generals tomorrow, when I take my winters off for the season.

Pros: excellent treadwear, quiet
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 25000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I had two sets of the Kumho Crugen HT51 SL. I liked both times and they lasted about 40,000 miles each. Seemed low but they're snow rated so I know those don't get as many miles because the rubber is softer. They handled great in snow/sleet/ice and enabled my front wheel drive van to go through lots of winter weather driving.

This last set (third owned) pissed me off though and barely made it 18,000 miles even with proper inflation and alignment.

Pros: handled great in snow
Cons: low mileage, rubber softer
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires
somerandomdude419
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I just got 4 General AltiMax RT45 installed on my 2008 Pontiac vibe. All date codes are 3523, so they are pretty fresh. Only put about 300 miles on them so far. I like them, car handles rain, had slight snow nothing crazy, and dry, drives very nice, not loud, but my issue is a *vibration* I never had before.

Pros: handles rain, drives nice
Cons: noticeable vibration
Mileage: 482 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
No-Cat-2980
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Stay away from Kumho tires, I’m just a Dad with a Sienna for the family, but I had a Honda Fit I drove 4 miles to the office for work. Got a pair of Kumho 80k rated, thought would be the last I’d have to buy. Worn out at barely 21k on them, on a Fit that don’t weigh much more than a lawnmower.

Cons: worn out quickly
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 80

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...