Tires Kumho or Barum

Kumho Tires
toffepeeruitpeer
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

They are very comfortable and quiet. But sidewalls are soft so this is not a sporty tire. Can't comment on threa dweare and winter performance as i have them for a month.

Pros: very comfortable, quiet
Cons: soft sidewalls, not sporty
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum Tires
fenea95
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Am Barum Polaris 5 si mi-au placut, erau ieftine, acu 3 ani le-am luat cu 1000 toate 4 205/55/R16. Sunt moi, au sant pentru aderenta pe ploaie, dar dupa teste nu par ca exceleaza acolo, eu nu am simtit, iar pe zapada sunt excelente. Barum este sub-brand Continental si au fost facute in UE. Probabil sunt prea moi, si se consuma mai rapid, dar nu ma deranjat, oricum ma lovesc mai intai de vechime decat de cat de consumate sunt, si au tinut 3 sezoane sigur merg si al patrulea. Deasemenea se umplu de pietricele prin gauri. Not top performance, dar ok,

Pros: ieftine, excelente pe zăpadă, durabile
Cons: moi, se umplu de pietricele, performanță medie pe ploaie
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The HA32 has pretty OK performance for an all-weather tire, it placed mostly in the middle of the pack in this review. Wet braking performance is a little behind the competition.

Pros: OK performance
Cons: wet braking behind
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
AnyClownFish
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Leaving aside whether or not the mechanic should have changed them, the difference in quality and performance between Kumho and Bridgestone is negligible, virtually nil.

Pros: negligible difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Threet3n
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).

In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).

Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 44

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...