Tires IRONMAN or LASSA

IRONMAN Tires
mcep87
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Ironman have been good on my inlaws buick enclave. Travels a fair amount between houstin and west texas...they've had em for about 5 yrs or so.

Pros: have been good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I had those on my Stock S13 (169 HP) on 17's and they worked like a charm.

Beautiful consistent Grip through the whole tire-life. I also didn't overinflate them. Ran them on 2 Bar cold pressure.

I honestly was impressed how well they worked on my car.

Pros: consistent grip, whole tire-life
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
LASSA Tires

Ja vozim Lassa i letnje i zimske. One su budget gume, kostaju 9.5k svaka ali ja nisam primetio da su mi smetale bilo kad.

Pros: nisam primetio da smetale
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I got the ironman iMove gen 2 as, for about 600 CAD plus instal they are a all season and have been really good so far, just terrible in snow and ice other then that I'd recommend

Pros: good all season
Cons: terrible in snow, ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

Another vote for Ironmans. Used to run them on my foxbody until I wanted more grip

Pros: another vote
Cons: wanted more grip
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I use 245-45-17 but ironman gen 2s have slightly less grip, and will last about as long. Only big downside I noticed is off throttle the ironmans will "float" alot more than the 595s. I started running the ironmans when the federals started going out of stock everywhere this summer

Pros: last about as long
Cons: less grip, float more
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
LASSA Tires

I've never heard of Lassa tires. Off brand tires are not exactly well designed and manufactured so they could just be loud as shit.

Cons: loud, not well designed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...