Tires Hankook or PHANTOM

Hankook Tires

I replaced my tires at 30k with Hankook Ion EVO AS EV tires. They are not cheap, but they are EV-rated and have good reviews.

Pros: good reviews, EV-rated
Cons: not cheap
Vehicle: Kia
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Rs4s are the super long (ive done 24hrs on a set) lasting, heatcyle to death with almost all its tread left tyre of choice... But conti ecf last just as long and run at least 1.5s faster per lap (@ wgi).

Pros: super long lasting, heatcycle death
Cons: conti ecf faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

I do endurance racing as well and the sponsored tire is the Hankook Ventus RS-4. They are a great 200TW tire for traction and durability. If you abuse it they won’t last. They are directionally treaded, but if you run in the dry it won’t matter which direction you run them, so rotating doesn’t have to be an issue. Similar to the AR-1, good lifespan for the performance at the grip levels when compared to the competition.

Pros: great traction, good durability
Cons: won't last if abused
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Kankook RS4, Khumo V730, Conti ECF, Falken RT660+ are tires I would consider on long lasting side of the performance category. I'm not sure they even make the RS4 now but there should be lots of old stock. Those tend to last so long you end up heat cycling them before burning up the rubber.

Pros: long lasting, good performance
Cons: heat cycling them
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
FillBk
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Ca alternative, recomand Hankook. Eu am de vara cu clasa A la aderență pe drum umed si 69DB ca zgomot. Sincer, își merită toți banii.

Pros: aderență bună, zgomot redus
Vehicle: Volvo V60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
CarmoXX
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve run RS4s for the last 3 years. First set lasted 2 years, about 14 track days and 10K miles total between street driving (April to October) and track miles. They saw rain both on track and street without issue. They would have lasted longer but I picked up a puncture on one of them. It’s not a fast tire but it lasts and is very flexible. I’ve driven them in high 30 to low 40 degree weather with no drama.

Pros: lasts long, very flexible
Cons: not a fast tire
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

My Michelin OEMs are at 40k miles now and I need to replace them. So far Hankook ION EVO AS SUV tires are my first choice. I'm in Florida so snow isn't a worry, but summers are extremely wet. I'm a little concerned about some user reviews that call out poor wet road performance and worrisome hydroplaning.

Pros: first choice
Cons: poor wet performance
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Also in Colorado with 50e. Have 21-inch wheels with factory Hankook “all season” performance run flats. Just ordered a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s for winter to replace the Hankooks that perform like I’m on an ice rink with bald tires…

Pros: for winter
Cons: perform like on ice
Vehicle: BMW X5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 66

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...