Tires Hankook or OEM Honda

I bought Hankook I*cept 3 winters and they were cheaper than some others in my size, still expensive but rated way higher than the rest. God damn they’re incredible. My 340i X-drive only slips when I want it to, even here in Alberta, Canada where we get loads of black ice and also tons of slushy days.

I actually like the Hankook ion as so far, quiet 10% more range, and comfortable vs Conti and seem to handle well.

I tracked my 95 Miata with original, stock, 26yr old suspension with 200tw hankooks and endurance racing pads, roll bar and 6 pt harnesses was all I ran for the longest, and keep up with faster cars in intermediate/ occasionally advanced in my 95hp, 2750lb car

Nobody ever talks about Hankook Dynapro AT2's and I dont know why. I havent really tested mine on tough trails, but they have been great on rutted out fire roads and on city streets. So far so good.

Cazan din 2001, Nexen de vară, Bfgoodrich de iarnă, ambele clasa B la franare pe ud, anul viitor trebuie să-mi iau alt set de vară și îmi face cu ochiul Hankook cu seria Ventus Prime.

Merg pe hankook de ani de zile si recomand tuturor.

Eu mi-am cumpărat anul acesta hancook pe o alfa 159 ;) și sunt mulțumit.

Drivers who seek strong performance and superb handling in all weather situations should choose for Hankook.

I have them and have had them in the past...they're halfway descent. There are much better tires out there depending on what you need. My complaints are that they are not as good as they should be for the rating as far as grip, also they are relatively noisy, and rougher than i prefer.

I have the Ventus V12s on my SLK in the Bay Area too. Very similar tire. They absolutely suck at displacing water. I can legit lose the back end in heavy rain at medium speeds. The grip and launch in the summer is great, but they are simply not designed for water displacement.