Tires GISLAVED or MRF

MRF Tires
wolwologan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Economical and life span, I would recomend mrf wanderer. 6k per tire and will give you 70k+ km life.

Pros: economical, long life
Vehicle: Suzuki
Mileage: 70000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Harder tires like MRF, Ceat, JK etc., will offer good lifetime and low wear and tear.

Pros: good lifetime, low wear
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I have these on my Speed 400. I must say they are pretty good. No comparison to any other road tyre MRF has manufactured so far. They are atleast as good as Apollos if not better.

Pros: pretty good, better than MRF
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GISLAVED Tires

I had a very good experience with the Gislaved Nordfrost 100s. They were fairly priced, they have a crazy amount of tread for a tire, and their performance was very good.

Pros: very good performance
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GISLAVED Tires

I currently drive 2018 XC90 r5 and live in Montreal, Canada with Gislaved tires. There is absolutely nothing in Volvo XC90 that makes it ideal car to handle large amount of snow.

Cons: not ideal for snow
Vehicle: Volvo XC90
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Not MRF. We have a six hour proddie car race at Bathurst sponsored by them and I never met anyone who drove on them say anything good about MRF

Cons: no good feedback
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires
fishfish2love
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Yes , my brother installed these and I was stuck with them but I was glad these wore out in just 30K , happily i replaced them with Yoko now. They are hard as well so it's not comfortable

Pros: wore out quickly
Cons: hard, not comfortable
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...