Tires Firestone or Nokia

Nokia Tires
ProtonPi314
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Nokian Hak 10 are great as well, but I think they are a bit noiser and less life. But they do grip really well. I used Nokians without them being studded....my truck took off at icy intersections like nothing.

Pros: grip really well, excellent icy grip
Cons: a bit noiser, less life
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I've been pretty happy with the cost/benefit of Firestone Indyhawk/Indy500/whatever they're calling them these days, on the stock wheels. They don't last long (I get 10-15k miles out of a set) but they're damn cheap ($650-$750), and break traction quite easily and predictably, if you enjoy going a little sideways often. I usually am running the Flying Miata alignment specs with these tires break loose fantastically easily and enjoyable for me on that alignment. On a factory alignment though they are reasonably grippy for spirited street driving. Again though the biggest benefit of them is they are super widely available (because Firestone) and CHEAP.

Pros: good cost/benefit, predictable traction, widely available, cheap, reasonably grippy
Cons: don't last long
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have nokian on the car and its been fantastic, been using nokians for ages for winter tires.

Pros: fantastic performance, long-term use
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian Hakkapeliitta is your best answer. These tires run toe to toe with everything else available on snow and ice acceleration and handling and beat everything else on stopping ability on snow and ice.

Pros: excellent snow, ice handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 103

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...