Tires Falken or Nokia

Nokia Tires

If you want something that lasts longer than Blizzaks but still handles snow incredibly well, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 is the other top pick. Both completely change your confidence on hills and side streets.

Pros: handles snow incredibly well
Cons: lasts longer than Blizzaks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
SageThunder
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

200tw Falken RT615K+, incredibly cheap. Take lot of heat. Better than a 4s. Don\u2019t wear that bad

Pros: incredibly cheap, takes heat
Cons: wears quickly
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Falken WildPeaks for the W and also just drive slower man it\u2019s never that deep. Don\u2019t wreck someone\u2019s life for a little convenience \u2764\ufe0f

Pros: drive slower
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Jcxbr
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I just put the Nokian Hakkapelitta R5SUV tires on my R1S (also in Colorado). You can put those on the 22" wheels. I will put my Pirellis back on for summer driving.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We have two Model Y’s in Alaska and I buy Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 EV winter studless tires. I’ve always used studless winter tires on my Subarus and now we use them on our teslas. They’re pricey—I paid $1,850 for the set (not installed, and no rims) a couple months ago. We keep them on November through March and they typically last at least 3 winters.

Pros: lasts at least 3 winters
Cons: pricey
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
bftvpro
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

They are more quiet than my original continental tires and 150 less per tire, with better specs than original

Pros: more quiet, better specs
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I’ve enjoyed mine as well, and I’m about due for a new set.

But, just tossing this out there, I found they aren’t as grabby in soft sand or wet snow as I would have liked (conditions I find myself in).

They’re hyped up, and I liked mine, but don’t plan on getting them again.

Pros: enjoyed them
Cons: not grabby in soft sand, not grabby in wet snow, won't buy again
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

2025 forester with 3200 miles on the falken tires. I have already had 2 instances of road damage. First a sheet metal screw in the tread and now a puncture and tear on the inner sidewall due to a piece of gravel.

Pros: low mileage
Cons: road damage, sidewall tear
Mileage: 3200 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 163

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...