Tires Falken or MRF

Falken Tires
spac83
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I put Falken Wildpeak 235's on my '09 Liberty back in April and I'm really happy with them. Great traction off-road and quiet enough to be my daily drive. Would highly recommend them.

Pros: great traction off-road
Cons: null
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
dreamtank
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Wow great work man thanks! I have Falken FK510 tires on my S. FWIW, excellent tire but holy shit was I surprised to see the rears were almost bald after 1 summer. (About 10000 kms)

Pros: excellent tire
Cons: rears almost bald
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I had the Falken Azenis on my S, I liked them. Great value summer tire and I don’t need no stinking snow grip here in Phoenix.

Pros: great value, summer tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

What a relief! Thanks to your chart, I see that I won't need to fork $329 per tire to replace the MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4S mounted on my Model 3 Performance. It looks like the AZENIS FK510 will do the same job for a bit more than half the price of the Michelin!

Pros: cheaper than Michelin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
Kingobadiah
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I got falken sincera tires for my 15 fit and 13 Yaris. No issuues and they were cheap and high mileage rated. I recall on my Yaris they took a little getting used to as the sidewalls seemed to have more play but with the Honda they felt just like the ones that came new with my car.

Pros: cheap, high mileage rated
Cons: sidewalls seemed to have play
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'd use the OEM Falken Sincera’s. This is because I read this review: "So far I have had no flats or problems with the OEM Falken Sincera’s other than being a bit noisy. They have done ok in the DC area weather where we get little snow and I think 40K for tread wear isn’t too bad."

Pros: no flats, ok weather
Cons: a bit noisy
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Thus far, I'm happy with the Falken tires in 205/60-16 that came on my car. I'm not shy to take turns at higher speeds than everyone around me and these aren't giving me much to complain about so far. I am surprised! Did well in a big rain fall.

Pros: good in rain, good handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
johnnyhowell
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Around Thanksgiving last year, I had two Michelin MXV4 Eco+ OEM stock tires that were worn and need of replacing. I followed suggestions of colleagues and Consumer Reports and bought two Falken Ziex ZE-512, and installed them on the front of my 1998.5 Turbo Passat Wagon. Although I kept the same size (195/65/R15) I was impressed immediately: much better handling, steering response, road feel, as well as seriously improved wet and dry grip. Extremely stable at 90mph+ speeds, and good cornering. After about 1000 miles however, I thought I had front-end or transmission problems, as there was this terrible WHOO=WHOO sound coming from the front. I took it to a shop and they said no trouble, just tire noise. Noise worsened, so took to VW dealer in Maine while on the road; they said that car was aligned perfectly per spec, but Falken tires were \"cupped\", and worn on the inside.

Pros: better handling, improved grip
Cons: excessive tire noise, cupped
Mileage: 1609 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'd avoid falkens One car I bought had them installed 5k before I bought the car. I had the receipt of everything and they were already below 50% worn. (they were 512's) I then bought another car with Falken 912's that were put on 15k a go and they only have about 3-5k tread left.

Pros: none
Cons: wore out quickly
Mileage: 5000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 98

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...