Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Falken ➔ Kleber Page 15

Tires Falken or Kleber

Reviews
All
Falken
Kleber
Falken › Tires
N0TAC0P_
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Finally bought bigger tires, Falken Wildpeak A/T 255/55r18, and couldn’t be happier. Even without NVH foam, the ride is quieter, smoother, and less bumpy.

Pros: quieter ride, smoother ride, less bumpy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
finnbee2
Rating 5.0

When the OEM tires wore out, I replaced them with Falken Wildpeaks. My 14 has 221,000 miles on it.

Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 355651 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
Ile_Campbell
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Ran the Falkens on my Gladiator and on my current Wrangler in New England and loved them. They are fantastic in the snow and ice and not overly loud.

Pros: fantastic in snow/ice, not overly loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kleber › Tires
DetectiveVinc
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Kleber Quadraxer 3 sind auch ok, w\u00fcrde ich sagen. Bei Schnee und Trockenbremsen sogar besser als der Goodyear Gen 3 (der schw\u00e4chelt traditionell im Trockenen), nur bei N\u00e4sse m\u00fcsstest du halt bissl mehr Sicherheitsabstand halten.

Pros: besser bei Schnee, Trockenbremsen
Cons: N\u00e4sse Sicherheitsabstand halten
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
jen_ema
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.5

These wore down so quick for me… great at first but the durability is not there.

Pros: great at first
Cons: wore down quick, durability not there
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
LasVegas_RealNews25
Rating 1.0

The factory Falken tires on the Cx90 PHEV will not wear well and you will be lucky to get 10-12k miles outta the new tires.

Cons: poor wear, low longevity
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kleber › Tires
lucianpacurar
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Those looked better but couldn’t be balanced. I got my money back because they had a defect.

Pros: looked better
Cons: couldn't be balanced, had defect
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all
Loading...
›