Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

Falken Tires

I have the LT version in that exact size. They are surprisingly great on bitumen with hardly any road noise which is great for your use case. Currently at 35k and no noticeable wear at all with mostly bitumen use. They seem like new.

Pros: great on bitumen, hardly noise
Cons: no noticeable wear
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Went with Bridgestone RE-71RS set. Paid $950 USD for set of four from Tire Rack in October and paid to have them heat cycled by them.

So far: 1198 street miles, 4 days of Autocross with 46 runs on them.

Pros: 4 days of Autocross
Mileage: 1198 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
ratherabeer
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I went with fallen 615+ not the fastest but should last a good number of runs

Pros: last a good number
Cons: not the fastest
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Bridgestone A005 is less highly regarded in the snow and more for wet and cold (i.e Scotland), but both are miles and miles clear of a summer tyre in the snow.

Pros: good for wet, cold
Cons: poor snow performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Based on the fact that my Bridgestone Alenza Sport tires are wearing out after only 9K miles, I would avoid Bridgestone like the plague.

Cons: wearing out after 9K
Mileage: 14484 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Alenza Sport tires on my 2022 Id4 RWD are falling apart after only 9K miles. The 2 front tires are peeling, same as Mrdingdong23 said in the initial post.

Cons: tires are falling apart
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 9000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...