Tires Barum or MRF

MRF Tires
MayorPlayz
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I had Bridgestone B250 165/80 R14 as stock on my Ritz 2011, those were very bad at braking performance, and didn\u2019t provide any kind of comfort at all, even the underbody touched a few speed breakers when the car was fully loaded. But then I switched to MRF ZLX 185/70 R14 tyres and those were in a league of their own, great braking, comfort and much less body roll.

Pros: great braking, comfort
Cons: bad braking performance
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum Tires

Pana acum nu am avut deloc probleme chiar si in conditii mai speciale. Mereu cand au fost conditii de vreme mai dificile am adaptat viteza incat sa conduc in siguranta.

Pros: nu am avut probleme
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum Tires

Barum Polaris 6. Au fost foarte bine cotate inclusiv versiunile anterioare (eu am folosit Polaris 3) in cateva clasamente din anii anteriori, fiind deseori in primele 5 locuri umar la umar cu marcile premium.

Pros: foarte bine cotate
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires
oldval
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Same in my Nexon, so far the tyres have been good. One tyre had a sidewall puncture after 28k kms. Replaced it with the same. The rest of them are running without zero punctures in 37.6k kms, and have seen all kinds of terrains. I'm quite satisfied with the performance.

Pros: satisfied with performance
Cons: sidewall puncture
Mileage: 37600 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I also got it when I was on my trip (3k kms on altroz racer r3). I stopped for alignment and found bubble. The tyre shop referred me to MRF district office. MRF office told me to contact car dealer for letter you just mentioned. While i just communicating for letter, told me.. not needed.. he just checked tyre tread depth, gave me a letter which tells tyre shop to install new tyre, got back to tyre shop, got it installed. Continued trip. Total time : 2 hours.

Pros: quick replacement process
Cons: tire bubble
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I too had a similar experience with MRF ZVTV - it was attributed to external damage and wasn’t covered under warranty. Had to get the tyre replaced.

Cons: tire defect, warranty rejected
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

My car completed 14.8k kms, and I noticed this bulge on the right rear tire. The tires are MRF Ecotred that came with the car. I didn't notice it anytime before so I don't know when did it show up.

Cons: tire bulge, quality issue
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 14800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum Tires

Der einzige Reifen der mir mal bei 240kmh auf der Autobahn geplatzt ist war einer von Barum (wohl eine Tochtermarke von Continental) hatte damals der Vorbesitzer des Fahrzeuges gekauft und montiert

Cons: Reifen geplatzt bei 240kmh
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Mine was mrf and did not have a good experience. Within 1 month 4k km run tire burst in a simple pot hole with 33 psi air pressure

Pros: null
Cons: tire burst in pothole
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...