Brake pads Zimmermann or Raybestos

Raybestos Brake pads
CompWizrd
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I have Raybestos AT's(96087) on my front, and Hawk HPS HB418F.646 pads. Don't think Hawk makes the HPS pads anymore though. I'm at about 2.5 years on mine, got 4 years out of the last set, after putting up with the OEM's for 4.5 years. Still on the factory rear drums.

Far better than OEM.

Pros: far better than OEM
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Part number: 96087
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
Slimy_Shart_Socket
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

So I don't work for Raybestos but I do install a ton of them. Those EHT are really good for normal vehicles. The price is right, dust is low, pedal feel is great, friction is about on par with OEM and in some cases better. They will survive about 10-15 medium effort stops, and about 3-5 Hard ABS stops. I wouldn't put them in anything bigger than a 7-Seater V6 Crossover, and the weight of those is on the limit of what the pads can do, but over all very good.

Pros: good price, low dust, great pedal feel, good friction
Cons: limited for heavy vehicles
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
EZ
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

So I mentioned to Mike at GiroDisc (who is great btw) that I was in the market for pads, and he recommended Raybestos ST43s, which get great reviews. So I went with them, but two events ago they put deposits on the rotors so bad the car shook like mad after a few laps. I still had the HT-10s with me, so I swapped them, they wiped the deposits off and I was back in business for the day.

Pros: great reviews
Cons: horrible deposits
Vehicle: Audi TT RS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...