Brake pads Textar or OEM Subaru

Textar Brake pads
thomasj222444
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

I do plenty of track days and the OEM Textar pads are grippy enough, modulate well, and hold up just fine on the track. If you want something that's not loud on the street or dusty as hell, OEM is probably the best option

Pros: grippy, good modulation, durable
Cons: loud, dusty
Vehicle: MAN
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
jaystone
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I used OEM replacement Textar pads. At some later date I may go with something a bit more grippy, but for DD duties the Textar/Porsche pads seem to be more than up to the task.

Pros: up to the task
Cons: not very grippy
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Boeys123
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I recommend Textar, great bite and no need of pre-heating. They also don't cause too much wear on the discs and on the other hand don't generate much brake dust.

Pros: great bite, low dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
sales@driveautoworks
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Textar is an OEM supplier, and they're not that expensive - run with those. Same amount of dust as stock, but no noise, and stock like braking characteristics.

Pros: no noise, stock characteristics
Cons: same dust as stock
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
Indigo20v
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I as well just replaced the oem brakes after almost 7 years. Other than a warrantied sensor, I've not had any issues. Still a blast to drive after 7 years, it still feels new.

Pros: still a blast to drive
Mileage: 48000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
downytide
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

I had an 2017 Outback 2.5, had it since April of 2017 until last week, during that time I put on 93k km on it. I wish I had gotten the 3.6, I got the 2.5 hoping to save fuel, my average was around 25mpg for lifetime, and I drive a lot on hwy and country road, I never once was able to hit the 30mpg even if it's just me in the car and driving 50mph on the country road, this part I really feel like Subaru should correct their mpg reading, in winter it can get as bad as 18mpg in the freezing weather, as when it's cold the transmission will make the engine constantly rev at higher to warm it up, the 2.5 is also not a smooth engine when at idle, I had a vibration issue that was deemed normal. Overall, it's a reliable car, but its not a durable car, another thing is, when taking off quickly from a stop, it can really bog down, most people are used to first gear and just boot, but these CVT don't have first gear and it can be rather unexpected, I've almost got hit from behind a couple times from that. The eyesight is a good feature, the lane departure can be annoying at times but I was ok with it, these cars have an issue with windshield chipping, and if the car has eyesight, the windshield need to be a specific one and then the eyesight needs to be re-calibrated, this happened to me TWICE, and it got expensive very quick. OEM tires are lousy, by lousy I mean it doesn't even get good mpg, doesn't get good grip in ANY condition and puncture easily if you take it to any sort of gravel road, I had puncture the tire within 1200km, I just got some decent A/T tires after, no problem for the last 90k. The brakes are soft, so first thing I did was changed the pads.

Pros: reliable car, eyesight is good
Cons: windshield chipping, brakes are soft
Mileage: 93000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...