Brake pads Textar or DIXCEL

Textar Brake pads
soul2k
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I replaced mine with Textar epad ceramic pads and Zimmerman rotors and I have been satisfied so far. There is slightly less bite with a ceramic pad vs OEM but also has much less dust.

Pros: less dust
Cons: less bite
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
TechnoPenguin_
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I am happy with Textar pads, no noticeable squealing, but they do make the wheels dusty fairly quickly. Previous pads were Pagid and they were just horrible, squealing, no brakes when cold, etc.

Pros: no squealing, quiet operation
Cons: dusty wheels
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Donseli
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I got Zimmerman rotors and Textar brake pads for my 2013 550i with the M package. Everything is been working great for the last 6 months.

Pros: working great
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

At the shop I run, we use textar pads on Zimmerman rotors. For some reason textar on textar always make noise on BMWs ( we elevated our complaints all the way to Textar, and they sent a rep to finally shrug). Pagid pads are ok, but I find they wear out more quickly.

Pros: reliable, rarely complaints
Cons: noise, wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
Butcher
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

My go to brake pad is Textar. Why? Less problems. Since I own a shop, any warranty issue is wasted time. I will not charge a client to make it right. I do not have time to do the job a second time.

Pros: less problems
Cons: warranty issue is wasted time
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
custardbun01
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

Dixcel ES pads are a “fast street” pad with low noise and dust that out perform oem pads and can be used for light track application also with effective heat range of 0-600 degrees Celsius. I think they’re the best “bang for buck” pad you can get.

Pros: low noise, low dust, good performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads
adam_e30
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I replaced my front brakes recently with Textar pads and new Zimmerman rotors (non-PP brakes). Overall I am happy with them; I think they have a little more cold bite than the original pads do but are very similar to the stock pad compound. Original pads left deep grooves/ridges in the rotor around 55k miles. I don't track/autocross the car and I'm pretty easy on brakes. I also prefer and good cold bite which you don't always get with a ceramic pad.

Pros: good cold bite, similar to stock
Cons: original pads left grooves
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
matadorformissles
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 2.5

had a track day over the weekend and saw that a hard, black substance that seems a little rubbery had formed on the brakes. The brake pads are Dixcel ES brake pads. I had not bedded them in and instead street drove with it for a couple months as the website suggested. Brake grease was placed on the pad surface contacting caliper. The track has lots of left turns and I braked from 170+ kmh to 80kmh on the first corner. I'm pretty new so i may have braked deep as I was turning. The substance formed heavily on right front wheel, less on left front and none on rear. Brakes were smoking lightly when i came into the pits. Braking feel didn't change throughout the day as I continued lapping. Car still tracked straight. I tried not to brake too hard and didn't observe any other substance buildup.

Cons: brake smoking, substance buildup
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

Textar pads are OEM I believe. My advice is just avoid brembo pads. Mine create so much dust my wheels look awful a day after being cleaned

Cons: lots of dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...