Brake pads Raybestos or Hawk Performance

Raybestos Brake pads

Brakes are a composition issue. rears wore out at 34,000 miles on my 22 Taos S. Replaced with Raybestos Hybrid ceramic and with 87,000 they still have plenty of life.

Pros: plenty of life
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 34000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
jbourne0129
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

i run dedicated track pads, HAWK HP+ . they are loud and filthy but perform phenomenally well for my skill level.

Pros: phenomenal performance
Cons: loud, filthy
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

If you want upgraded pads. Try HAWK 5.0 pads. You can't go wrong with a better initial bit, better response and shorter stopping distance.

Pros: better initial bit, better response
Cons: may make noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads

I have the Raybestos EHT on my ol' Camry and Avalon. They lack longevity and will pulse toward then end of their usable life. The quality control has slipped a little of the years. You might have to file fit them(as with any pad). I'd say that they won't tolerate a hack installer. My EHT stopped better than my Akeboner proacts.

Pros: better stopping power (than Akebono)
Cons: lack longevity, pulse near end of life, slipped quality control, difficult installation
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 49

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...