Brake pads Raybestos or Hawk Performance

Raybestos Brake pads
CompWizrd
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I have Raybestos AT's(96087) on my front, and Hawk HPS HB418F.646 pads. Don't think Hawk makes the HPS pads anymore though. I'm at about 2.5 years on mine, got 4 years out of the last set, after putting up with the OEM's for 4.5 years. Still on the factory rear drums.

Far better than OEM.

Pros: far better than OEM
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Part number: 96087
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Raybestos Brake pads
Slimy_Shart_Socket
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

So I don't work for Raybestos but I do install a ton of them. Those EHT are really good for normal vehicles. The price is right, dust is low, pedal feel is great, friction is about on par with OEM and in some cases better. They will survive about 10-15 medium effort stops, and about 3-5 Hard ABS stops. I wouldn't put them in anything bigger than a 7-Seater V6 Crossover, and the weight of those is on the limit of what the pads can do, but over all very good.

Pros: good price, low dust, great pedal feel, good friction
Cons: limited for heavy vehicles
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
econsj
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

if you are sick and tired of scrubbing your wheels then i would highly recommend ceramic pads as the dust is a fraction of the OEM pads. I just changed out mine a few months ago (hawk ceramic from pelican parts) and the change is night and day. I don't track may car and i would say i'm mildly spirited in my driving, but these have been great so far.

Pros: less dust, night and day change
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Tylpt
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I had about 21,000 kms on my GLI and noticed a little bit of vibration at higher speed braking. I was sick of the OEM pads dust so I swapped out the pads to Hawk HPS street 5.0's. The front rotors had a ton of wear on it for a relatively new car. I heard from a few shops that the OEM pads eat rotors. I decided to change the front rotors but kept the rears as there was hardly any wear on it. Brake pedal feels much more solid and next to no brake dust and better braking power. Great upgrade and strongly recommend.

Pros: better braking power, less dust
Cons: front rotors wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
UniverseCatalyzed
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Hawk HP+ is a very good multiuse pad if you can get them for your car. Be warned - they will squeak pretty loudly and dust your wheels, but they work fine on the street, great in the canyons, and will still last at least a few sessions on track.

Pros: good multiuse, works well on street and canyons
Cons: squeaks loudly, dusts wheels
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ArmenB
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.5

I used them on the street and in autocross on my '79 RX-7 and would agree that they were noisy and dusty on the street - the dust also ate through the finish on my wheels on that car. I didn't have fade issues with them, but that car was light and not very powerful, so it wasn't very hard on brakes.

Pros: no fade issues
Cons: noisy and dusty
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ghost03
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

The M240i needed new pads and rotors. I order HPS 5.0 + Zimmerman rotors from FCP's site which says they're compatible. I install them and the car sounds like a jalopy. Loud wub wub wub under braking and only braking, more pressure == more loud. It sounds like it's coming from both fronts.

Cons: loud wub wub wub
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 49

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...