Brake pads OEM Subaru or Centric

Centric Brake pads
SIX SPEED
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I got them installed and the hardest part was the dam clips they are so hard to compress to slide them in. I had to juggle them sideways. Anyone had this problem? I needed a second hand. They feel great! They are so much thicker than stock. I fallowed this guy's video: Yes I had to compress the Pistons.

Pros: feel great, thicker than stock
Cons: hard to install clips
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Centric Brake pads
RandyL
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

The Centric PosiQuiet ceramics are WAY better than the OEM pads, no nasty hard-to-modulate initial bite. Rather the Centric's are quite linear in their force-to-braking ratio. I just upgraded my '18 GTI to a '19 R and have a set on order.

Pros: better than OEM, linear ratio
Cons: no nasty initial bite
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Centric Brake pads
RandyL
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I went with the Centric PosiQuiet Ceramic's too and am very happy with them Akebono does not have an application for my 2018 GTI SE but the PosiQuiet's feel the same to me as the Akebono's I had on my last two Audis.

Pros: very happy with them
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Centric Brake pads
fabric8
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Continuing to drive on them this way will not make the pad deposits go away. Trust me. I have the same ceramic pads on our 3 vehicles (golf r included). Centric posi quiets. They are great pads with great cold bite and minimal dust. But if you overheat them and stay on the brake pedal at a stop, like any other pad, it will embed pad material onto the rotor.

Pros: great cold bite, minimal dust
Cons: embed pad material
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
Indigo20v
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I as well just replaced the oem brakes after almost 7 years. Other than a warrantied sensor, I've not had any issues. Still a blast to drive after 7 years, it still feels new.

Pros: still a blast to drive
Mileage: 48000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
FaLeX
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

The STi also stops hard. It turned in the shorter braking distance of the two cars, using just 114.5 feet of asphalt to haul down from 60 mph. Pedal feel is firm and progressive, and ABS operation is quiet and refined.

Pros: firm pedal feel
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
clarkma5
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

Subarus in general are frickin' bulletproof. (WRX transmissions aside) I drove a Subaru Legacy 30th Anniversary Edition (2.5 liter, automatic...I think it's pretty similar to the '97 Legacy GT) and it was a surprisingly good drive...good handling and pretty good power...brakes were a bit sucky, though.

Pros: good handling, good power
Cons: brakes were sucky
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
downytide
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

I had an 2017 Outback 2.5, had it since April of 2017 until last week, during that time I put on 93k km on it. I wish I had gotten the 3.6, I got the 2.5 hoping to save fuel, my average was around 25mpg for lifetime, and I drive a lot on hwy and country road, I never once was able to hit the 30mpg even if it's just me in the car and driving 50mph on the country road, this part I really feel like Subaru should correct their mpg reading, in winter it can get as bad as 18mpg in the freezing weather, as when it's cold the transmission will make the engine constantly rev at higher to warm it up, the 2.5 is also not a smooth engine when at idle, I had a vibration issue that was deemed normal. Overall, it's a reliable car, but its not a durable car, another thing is, when taking off quickly from a stop, it can really bog down, most people are used to first gear and just boot, but these CVT don't have first gear and it can be rather unexpected, I've almost got hit from behind a couple times from that. The eyesight is a good feature, the lane departure can be annoying at times but I was ok with it, these cars have an issue with windshield chipping, and if the car has eyesight, the windshield need to be a specific one and then the eyesight needs to be re-calibrated, this happened to me TWICE, and it got expensive very quick. OEM tires are lousy, by lousy I mean it doesn't even get good mpg, doesn't get good grip in ANY condition and puncture easily if you take it to any sort of gravel road, I had puncture the tire within 1200km, I just got some decent A/T tires after, no problem for the last 90k. The brakes are soft, so first thing I did was changed the pads.

Pros: reliable car, eyesight is good
Cons: windshield chipping, brakes are soft
Mileage: 93000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...