Brake pads Hawk Performance or OEM Chevrolet

Hawk Performance Brake pads
Audi'sRevenge
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

And yeah the 5.0 is the newer version. As per Hawk: Hawk Performance said: The HPS 5.0 compound is similar in application with a strong focus on improving the already great properties of HPS. This compound offers stronger fade reduction, increased stopping power, easier modulation, and a decrease in wear, noise, and dust. In short, this compound can take more abuse while maintaining great street friendly performance characteristics!

Pros: stronger fade reduction, increased stopping power
Cons: dusting is strong
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
midchamp
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Just replaced my PP pads & rotors. Hawk HPS & EBC RedStuff are both decent ceramic pad options. Shopped around quite a bit and never had the Brembos recommended. I went with Zimmerman blank rotors & Hawk HPS pads. No complaints + expecting less dust!

Pros: less dust, no complaints
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
DEO3
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I was pretty unhappy with the short life span/brake dust of the stock rotors/pads, so when it was time to change them I went with: Centric Cryo-Treated rotors, Hawk HP Street 5.0 pads. I got what I was looking for in terms of improvements to longevity and brake dust, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss the bite of the stock setup.

Pros: improved longevity, less brake dust
Cons: missed stock bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ottrocity
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Centric high-carbon rotors and Hawk HP Street 5.0s. Less initial bite than the OEM pads, but more stopping force with higher pedal pressures and much less dust.

Pros: more stopping force, much less dust
Cons: less initial bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Chevrolet Brake pads
NashGTI
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

The brake rotors from the Grand Cherokee and Caprice are nearly the same measurements though so I can mix and match. The bonus is that because of the 1996 Impala SS you can get performance brake pads for the Caprice calipers.

Pros: performance brake pads available
Vehicle: Chevrolet Caprice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

For pads I'm having pretty good success with the new Hawk Ceramic 5.0. I run those on my GLI(with Golf R calipers/brakes) and on the .:R. I was surprised for light track duty they were ok on both cars. Not a full on track pad to be clear. They are also a high torque pad so they have really good bite.

Pros: high torque, good bite
Cons: not for full track
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
cournot
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

They are absolutely not track pads. They fill this awkward in-between in which they have the coefficient of friction and modulation of good aggressive street pads but also dust and make tons of noise in street usage.

Pros: good aggressive street pads
Cons: dust and tons of noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 43

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...