Brake pads EBC or Akebono

EBC Brake pads
Ergo7
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

The OE Brembo pads are "okay" and the EBC Blue Stuff will give you better bite though they're still dusty. I went with 2-piece rotors and Endless MX72+ pads.

Pros: better bite (EBC)
Cons: dusty (EBC), okay (Brembo)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
rkmask51
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I hated the OEM rotors and pads. I replaced all 4 rotors and pads with a centric premium rotor with akebono pads. This was done at 35K miles, and now at 71K miles, I am very glad I did it and the new pads have held up well.

Pros: new pads held up well
Cons: hated OEM rotors and pads
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 56327 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
EBC Brake pads
Linkin623
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

My suggestions : Oil cooler, change break pads with ceramics (EBC redstuff), gallery gasket, replace half the exhaust line (the genuine rear silencer is a crime and heavy), rear tyres 285/35R19. Those things will make the car better, more reliable, safer (this car is 1.6t dry, you could be surprised with default brake attack) and widespread among Z lovers.

Pros: car better, more reliable
Cons: default brake attack
Vehicle: Nissan
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
YelloSmake
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I run Akebono pads on my Lexus/Toyota cars. They are ceramic, so there may be less bite than a semi-metallic pad, but they are very low dust and last long.

Pros: very low dust, last long
Cons: less bite
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads

I would stay away from ceramic Akebonos. Out of all ceramic pads I tried, they felt the most dangerous. They had close to zero initial bite and required three times the leg effort to brake.

Cons: zero initial bite, dangerous
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 113

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...