Brake pads DIXCEL or Hawk Performance

Hawk Performance Brake pads
FarSolar
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I've enjoyed my Hawk HPS 5.0 pads quite a bit, though I have the PP brakes. Handled a track day very well with no fade (I'm no pro so I'm sure they can fade if pushed hard enough).

Pros: handled track day well
Cons: can fade if pushed
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
jbourne0129
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

i run dedicated track pads, HAWK HP+ . they are loud and filthy but perform phenomenally well for my skill level.

Pros: phenomenal performance
Cons: loud, filthy
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads

Dixcel M-Type are the least dusty street pad I've ever used. A little pricey and straight from Japan, but they aren't kidding when they advertise "ultra low dust". Have about 1500 miles on them so far and they're great on the street and for the occasional togue/mountain days.

Pros: ultra low dust, great street
Cons: a little pricey
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Mileage: 2414 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

If you want upgraded pads. Try HAWK 5.0 pads. You can't go wrong with a better initial bit, better response and shorter stopping distance.

Pros: better initial bit, better response
Cons: may make noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

WRT the Hawk Pads… I’ve run both compounds and for a beginner you’re not going to notice the difference. They’re both good track pads. Do not run them on the street or if you do try to minimize the time you are on them and know you will have horrible stopping distance when cold.

Pros: good track pads
Cons: not for street, poor cold stopping
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 41

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...