Tires

Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers
Firestone Tires

Yeah, I have 20k with these on my Mazda6 and I wouldn't say they're unresponsive. In fact I would say they're quite responsive in that they like to track in the direction you're turning, so the car gets encouraged to dive into turns. One thing I have noticed is that they feel much more dead if you let them get low. Keep them at 36psi.

Pros: quite responsive, encourages turns
Cons: feel dead when low
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I’m glad the series asked Firestone for a bigger differential in pace between the reds and blacks. A lot of the time last year it seemed largely negligible.

Pros: bigger pace differential
Cons: pace largely negligible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
FearTheClown5
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The Hankooks are slightly softer absorbing a smidge more of the road. Noise difference between the 2 isn't noticeable at all. The Hankooks are slightly more efficient, lifetime on the Michelins is 306whm and the Hankooks are 297whm(tracked via TeslaMate).

Pros: slightly more efficient
Cons: slightly softer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'm 3k miles in on my 23 pro. 285/75/16's w/ spacers.

The Falken's are quieter.

They gave better grip in wet and icy conditions.

They did result in a very mild mpg hit.

Pros: quieter, better grip
Cons: mild mpg hit
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Cooper Tires

I just put 4 255/45R19's Cooper pro controls on my 2015 ford taurus limited. I live in Wisconsin and it's winter so I got to test them in the snow. Not bad for all seasons. I've driven with Bridgestone Blizzak winter tires and they're for sure not at that level but good enough grip, I felt confident ish in deep snow.

Pros: good enough grip
Cons: not Blizzak level
Vehicle: Ford Taurus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires

Wow, someone else asking about the General Altimax. the answer is YES! they are an excellent brand for the value. I have a 2002 Mercedes S500. They are wonderful tires and held up better than the Michelin or Goodyears. Excellent wet traction for a rear wheel drive car. I swear by them.

Pros: excellent wet traction
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DUNLOP Tires

Der Satz Reifen Dunlop Sport Maxx RT (nicht der 2er) hat mich das letzte Mal in den Dimensionen 225/40 R18 91Y knapp unter 300 Euro gekostet.

Pros: knapp unter 300 Euro
Vehicle: Audi A3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

Reason I'm asking is I'm running Nitto NeoGens 280tw (205/50/15) on a fairly light, low horsepower car (D15B7 Del Sol). I've had alignments done, check my air pressure every other time I get gas (35psi) and I'm at the wear bars in 12k miles.

Cons: wear bars in 12k miles
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 12000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Also in Colorado with 50e. Have 21-inch wheels with factory Hankook “all season” performance run flats. Just ordered a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s for winter to replace the Hankooks that perform like I’m on an ice rink with bald tires…

Pros: for winter
Cons: perform like on ice
Vehicle: BMW X5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review about tires

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Loading...