Tires YOKOHAMA or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've been running Blizzaks (WS80, then WS90) on the stock wheels on my '18 Sportwagen since new and have loved them.

Pros: have loved them
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Joestac
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I've had the At3s on my '24 OBW for almost 6000 and they are great. Ride just like the stock Yokohama Geolander. Gas mileage didn't suffer, and they are great off road.

Pros: great off road, good ride
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I bought the Weatherpeak 2 years ago. They were great tires in messy weather. No complaints at all there. But they wore down very quickly. Like in 25-40k.

Pros: great in messy weather
Cons: wore down quickly
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
yngwie98
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Bought Weatherpeaks instead of CC2 for our Crosstrek, no difference in MPG. They're quieter than the stock Falkens.

Snow traction isn't as good as dedicated winter tires but it's good enough for the winters around here.

Pros: quieter than stock
Cons: snow traction not great
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

If you need dedicated winter tires, best option is to buy a second set of rims and winter specific tires, Blizzaks are a personal fav of mine.

Pros: winter specific tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Those came on my truck when I bought it new. Very average tire that's not good for any nasty stuff.

Cons: not good for nasty stuff
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Only tires I’ve ever had a blow out on are Yokohamas. My falken wild peaks have been great

Pros: falken wild peaks great
Cons: blow out on Yokohamas
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 146

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...