Tires MICHELIN or Kormoran

MICHELIN Tires

I have these and can confirm they are great. I don’t feel the need to look at any other tires. I live in Colorado and they see a lot of snowy mountain use, which they handle very very well for not being dedicated snow tires.

Pros: handle very very well
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
KR92
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I had the Michelin's on my car as my last tire set and just thought I'd experiment with another tire brand for my current set so I picked up the Fallen FK510. I'd say for daily driving it's very compatible and less sketchy in rainy conditions

Pros: very compatible
Cons: less sketchy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
BeeThat9351
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

We have them on our 19 Pilot for about 25k miles. Very good wet traction. Note that they are directional so you can only rotate them front to back without using a tire machine to demount from the rim. Usually not an issue if you have good/even alignment and get even tire wear. So, moral of the story is get an alignment done after installling them.

I think they are a little bit noisier than than the original Continentals but they wore too fast.

Pros: very good wet traction
Cons: a little bit noisier
Vehicle: Honda Pilot
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
MasterInterface
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I have them on my Civic '16, and they are amazing for NYC. They handle hydroplaning really well too. They have a slightly higher hum compared to the Civic stock but it's really hard to notice especially in a loud city like NYC.

MPG did go down a bit but well worth the trade off for safety. They grip really well in wet conditions and shorten braking distance.

Pros: handle hydroplaning really well
Cons: MPG did go down
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Chan_Man_0000
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle.

Pros: excellent traction on wet roads
Cons: price about $1000
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 3218 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I would go with Michelin Pilot A/S 4 if money isn’t a factor. They’re more expensive, but *excellent* all around tires.

Pros: excellent all around tires
Cons: more expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
adrew
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Our '11 Yaris came with these in a T-rated 185/60-15 with 160 treadwear. They had some tread left but were super unsafe by 20k miles (no traction on wet roads and uncontrollable axle hopping wheelspin with light acceleration). Total throwaway trash tires: super loud, no grip, harsh riding.

Cons: super loud, no grip
Mileage: 32186 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...