Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires
BIIEB
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I've put Blizzaks on all of my vehicles, including my '24 Kona. They are fantastic studless snow tires.

Pros: fantastic snow tires
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Falken WinterPeak F-Snow 1. It's one of the cheapest winter tires - about $80/tire in the 195/65R15 size - but test results show it competes well with the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5, Continental VikingContact 7, and Michelin X-Ice Snow, which are the gold standards in premium winter tires. It looks like the Falken suffers a little with dry handling, so just don't drive your Corolla like a sports car. The Falken is still competitive in the wet, snow, and ice, which is where it really matters.

Pros: competitive in wet, snow, ice
Cons: suffers with dry handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
muttinfancy
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I have been running 265/75/16's SL with 2 ply standard sidewall for the last 30k miles on a first gen tundra. I run them pretty hard on and off road, including airing down. I haven't had any issues and am hard pressed getting a much heavier tire since these have performed so well

Pros: performed so well, no issues
Cons: not lasting as long
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

One recent set of tires (Bridgestone Potenza Sports - AMAZING!) less than a year ago, new brakes all around approximately 6 months ago.

Pros: AMAZING tires, new brakes
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
zerostar83
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had both the Turanza EL440 and those exact Firehawk tires. The Turanza I had would have lasted maybe 55k or 60k if it wasn't for me getting one damaged from a road hazard.

Pros: long lasting
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...