Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Continental ➔ BRIDGESTONE Page 71

Tires Continental or BRIDGESTONE

Reviews
All
Continental
BRIDGESTONE
Continental › Tires
AccidicOne
Rating 4.5

Personally I prefer Continental a little more for the pricing to performance advantage they offer (admittedly subjective). You do still pay a little for the name but it's not as painful of an upcharge as Michelin and their comparable lines in my size are over $50/tire cheaper. Recently I even lucked out and they're preferable to my prior Defenders.

Pros: better price/performance, preferable to prior tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
TippingFlables
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE › Tires
SnowmanJPS
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had blizzaks that I bought used on Kijiji for my outback I had, the previous person had them for 3 winters, and I also had them for 3 winters and there was still probably another winter left in them if you wanted to chance it, I didn’t have any issues with them, maybe a little rough but they were also on steel wheels

Pros: excellent longevity, no issues
Cons: a little rough
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 239

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all
Loading...
›