Tires BRIDGESTONE or Vredestein

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have them on my 2016 forester 2.5. I live in the middle of Indiana so for half of the year it rains somewhat regularly. Personally, I think the tire is great. I have made turns too quickly while the roads were wet and didn't slide around at all. Accelerating and braking, i consider the traction to be very good in all conditions.

Pros: great traction, safe commute
Cons: lower mileage in winter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires
LupusMaid
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

For Winter tyres, in terms of noise and harshness, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro and Hankook Winter i*cept Evo³ are trading blows with each other. I noticed, that the Hankook is noisier on some surfaces, while the Vredestein is on others. Same with bumps. Neither is crashy though or loud. The noise they make it is also a low tone, so not disturbing.

Pros: low tone noise
Cons: noisey on some surfaces
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires
jeff32
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Vredestein Quatrac Pro All Weather tires were used about 8 -9 months - approximately 6K miles. Excellent condition. 2 Tires have 9/32” wear, one with 8/32" and last one just under 8/32" (new is 10/32)

Pros: Excellent condition
Mileage: 9656 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
TestingWonTooTreee
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I'm running Bridgestone Potenza. I've gone through two sets of Micheline Pilot Sports within 25k miles. I'm hoping these Bridgestones last longer. In terms of performance I don't notice a difference between the two.

Pros: performance is good
Cons: hope they last longer
Mileage: 25000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 122

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...