Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

BRIDGESTONE Tires
RipSlow3412
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Bridgestone Turanza EV tires. No foam and quieter than the OE on the car. Rides better too :)

Pros: quieter than OE, rides better
Cons: no foam
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

2016 EX-L V-6 MT coupe. I seem to swap later every year. Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 dropping width to 225.

With the amount of snow decreasing these tires will wear faster on dry pavement. But they are good in snow and 40° and below weather.

Pros: good in snow
Cons: wear faster on pavement
Part number: WS90
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We put them on our 2018 XT this year, studless. Been pretty good so far. The -30C we've been getting in Calgary lately though there's still some slip on the hard sheer ice but no way I'd want to try regular all seasons!

Pros: pretty good so far
Cons: some slip on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have the Ones on my 1997 Toyota Estima Emina and they're great. Nice steering response and like Nokian's other all-season tires, they do great in the wet. I also appreciate the aramid (kevlar) sidewalls.

Pros: nice steering response, great in wet
Vehicle: Toyota Estima
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had a Mazda 6 that came fitted with Bridgestone Turanza. I got 4 years and 90,000km from those. I then fitted Potenza and got 2.5 years and 32,000km before they were gone.

Pros: long lasting Turanza
Cons: Potenza wore quickly
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 32000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
christophersdad
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I had their entyre series, basically the all weather option. A bit too firm for my liking. After 20k miles, they became very noisy.

Cons: too firm, very noisy
Mileage: 32186 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...