Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I put these, in this size, on my R1S— they seem great so far (2 weeks). Maybe a little more road noise?

Pros: seem great so far
Cons: little more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra on my Toyota Highlander. They have been a great tire, reasonably quiet, good traction in all four seasons (central Wisconsin). Down side, not much tread left after 52k

Pros: great tire, good traction
Cons: little tread left
Mileage: 83686 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone LM005 or the new version. Very good performances on wet surfaces (they are good in snow also) but the wet is A which not a lot of winter tires have it.

Pros: very good performances
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Bridgestones i just put on a week or 2 ago for this season so I don't know the life span on them yet but wet weather was decent (atleast now that they are brand new).

Pros: decent wet weather
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

New old stock Potenza Race available for $562 per set after rebate: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Bridgestone&tireModel=Potenza+Race&partnum=335YR9PRXLOS&vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes

I got them in 225/45R17 for my Golf wagon and actually received 2023 dated tires even though they were advertised as 2022.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
NTPC4
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Bridgestone tires suck, and you'll have to live with them for five years (if they last that long).

Cons: tires suck, don't last long
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...