Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

YOKOHAMA Tires

My vote is Yokohama G-003 MTs. Aggressive tire, yet has great street manners. I have good things about them in that thick Utah/Northern AZ mud. They are also good in snow.

Pros: good street manners, good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I personally use and love my Yokohama Advan Fleva v701s. They do fantastic in Florida rain, I've never even skid—no clue about the snow though.

Pros: fantastic in Florida rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian is the original OG in winter tire. In fact, they practically invented winter tires and have been developing winter tires since. It's all I will ever buy for winter tires. Remember that these tires were developed for the harsh Finland winters. It's why I'm currently running some Hakka R3s on my car.

Pros: developed for harsh winters
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Solterra owner here, living at 6k feet in the Sierra/Tahoe area..Installed WRg5s a month ago and it's been icy, near the freezing point on several occasions now. Maybe its the Solterra traction control, maybe its the tires...maybe its the combination of both, but I've been testing in black and glazed ice on the roundabouts and the tight icy corners and they won't. break. loose!

Pros: good traction on ice
Cons: almost boring driving
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

The OEM Geolanders that came on my '18 Crosstrek were the best tires I have ever owned and I always purchased Michelin or Continentals. I went back to Michelins because the Geolanders were 20% higher. The Michelins are no longer the benchmark of tires.

Pros: best tires ever
Cons: price was higher
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

They handle rain and snow pretty well... The worst was the ice storm down in Vancouver back in February. They did amazingly well for not being true snow tires and without studs

Pros: handle rain and snow
Cons: pick up small rocks
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have the Ascend LX as my summer set but I couldn't quite find a direct comparison talking about the LX compared to the GT The LX's are supposed to have been rated for 85K, but they're already at 6/32s after 25K. Other than that I haven't had much of an issue with them

Pros: no major issues
Cons: fast wear
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Shockwave179
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Hope you have a better experience with the Outpost AT’s than I did. Just pulled them off my WK2 Grand Cherokee and disposed of them after 15K. Either way had substantial cracking and dry-rotting in-between treadblocks and violent shaking that went away with new Destination AT2’s.

Cons: cracking and dry-rotting, violent shaking
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...