Tires MICHELIN or OEM Toyota

MICHELIN Tires

The CC2s are fantastic, I don’t think I actually lost much range with them more than I fitted them when it was colder. Snow, ice, rain they are amazing. Never had an issue with grip. Only reason I’ll go back to the sports is longevity at higher temps and deluging rain grip.

Pros: fantastic, amazing grip
Cons: longevity at temps
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have them and so far very happy with the purchase. I use them for every day driving there’s been no big impact on range or road noise.

Pros: happy with purchase
Cons: no big impact
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Yes to range drop, also yes to great performance in the snow, ice, and rain. My typical drive takes 15% to get home now, where it used to take 12%. They are relatively new (2 months), so break in may alleviate some of that.

I've been over the pass in the Sierra Nevada twice with them on (both i-80 and hwy 50), plus routine winter driving with snow and ice pretty much daily. Only time I've felt any wiggle is goosing it through a corner when nobody is around, just to get a feel for the handling. It recovers very gracefully.

Pros: great performance in snow
Cons: range drop
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Most_Reason7461
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I have some on mine and they’ve handled great on the rain, haven’t really done any snow driving. Only thing I’ve noticed is there’s a bit of a feint droning noise at high speeds. Haven’t really noticed any significant range impacts, although I’ve only used them for daily driving and don’t ever drop below 50% charge.

Pros: handled great on rain
Cons: droning noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Araziah
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I have some on my M3SR+. I'm in Utah, and they handle great in the snow here. They're a bit louder than the stock Primacy MXM4s. But they last a lot longer. The stock tires had to be replaced at 17k miles. The CC2s are at 15k miles now and still have ~7/32" of tread left. I haven't noticed any change in efficiency. I still get ~250Wh/mi average over the course of the year.

Pros: handle great in snow, last longer
Cons: bit louder
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
PapaManChild
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I purchased these tires for a road trip from Northern WA to So Cal.

It had no issues and it made me feel so safe. We drove through much rain, and some icey conditions.

A month later, I took it over the mountain passes of WA. Snow occurred a few days before, so the roads were plowed but still snowy/icey. Drove only 35mph but it handled like a dream. Never fish tailed once or felt loss of control.

Duirng normal WA state weather. Drives without issue. I don't notice any noise differences compared to my stock tires.

Pros: felt super safe, handled well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
bonealley01
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

yes on my 2016 they only lasted about 30k , replaced them with Michelin defenders they were still good at 106k when i traded it in for a 2022 CX-9 Signature. Next year will be replacing it with the Michelin again

Pros: good performance
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Bought a set of Bridgestone RE-71Rs. Fifth car (current STI): First set (besides factory tires) was Michelin Pilot Super Sports - not bad, but I missed the outright grip of the Bridgestone's- wore them down to the cords after 25k miles and a couple of track days.

Pros: outright grip
Cons: wore down to cords
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 25000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...