Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

MICHELIN Tires

I swapped the oem geolanders for Michelin cross climate 2’s since I don’t do much real offroading just hunting trails and mountain roads. They actually handle the wet leaf covered steep mountain side roads in pigeon forge better.

Pros: better wet leaf handling
Cons: OEM slippage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I’ve had 22” Nokians on my R1S for 8,000 miles, and noticed no difference in efficiency. I *have* noticed (as have others) that they have significantly more tread than the stock Pirellis at this same point. Given their cost, any increase in “fuel” costs due to worse efficiency (if that is a thing) will probably be more than made up for by the lower cost of the tires, and the (likely) longer useable life.

Pros: no efficiency difference, more tread, lower cost, longer life
Mileage: 12875 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michellin yung all weather. Been using it. So far so good. Tahimik at makapal pa rin kahit laging ginagamit

Pros: tahimik, makapal pa rin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The past couple of sets I've had were Michelin X-Ice and they've been excellent. The X-Ices last for 40k or something.

Pros: excellent, long lasting
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
biggranny000
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.5

CC2 has better grip all around especially in snow, it just might be more noisy and not last as long.

Pros: better grip, good in snow
Cons: more noisy, shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 ... 345

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...