Tires MICHELIN or Kumho

MICHELIN Tires
cee1337
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

My last set of Michelins were considerably more comfortable, quieter, grippier, and a lot more confidence inspiring. To top it off, wear wise, they were the longest lasting tyres I've had as well, actually making it good value.

Pros: comfortable, quieter, grippier, long lasting
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My first set I bought were Michelin cross climate 2s they were pretty expensive I think like $1,000 for the set but I got like 65-70,000 miles out of them and and probably could have gotten more but I got got an unrepairable flat and just replaced them all.

Pros: long lifespan (65-70k miles)
Cons: expensive
Mileage: 104607 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

X ICE SNOW, I have them on a Mazda SUV, had several German cars but the X ICE snow is a very good tire. It does wear quickly though.

Pros: very good tire
Cons: wears quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Aus meiner Erfahrung und der von einigen Bekannten, sind die Michelin Cross Climate 2 absolute top choice. Das Geld ist gut investiert.

Pros: absolute top choice, good investment
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
LEM1978
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I have the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 All Seasons on my 22s. They work ok, also a bit noisier. Not 100% in the snow, but get the job done.

Pros: acceptable performance
Cons: a bit noisy, not great in snow
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Threet3n
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).

In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).

Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 317

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...