Tires MICHELIN or KENDA

MICHELIN Tires
cee1337
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

My last set of Michelins were considerably more comfortable, quieter, grippier, and a lot more confidence inspiring. To top it off, wear wise, they were the longest lasting tyres I've had as well, actually making it good value.

Pros: comfortable, quieter, grippier, long lasting
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My first set I bought were Michelin cross climate 2s they were pretty expensive I think like $1,000 for the set but I got like 65-70,000 miles out of them and and probably could have gotten more but I got got an unrepairable flat and just replaced them all.

Pros: long lifespan (65-70k miles)
Cons: expensive
Mileage: 104607 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

X ICE SNOW, I have them on a Mazda SUV, had several German cars but the X ICE snow is a very good tire. It does wear quickly though.

Pros: very good tire
Cons: wears quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Aus meiner Erfahrung und der von einigen Bekannten, sind die Michelin Cross Climate 2 absolute top choice. Das Geld ist gut investiert.

Pros: absolute top choice, good investment
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had these on my 3 but my range took a major hit. They grip very well, but very inefficient.

Pros: excellent grip
Cons: reduced range, inefficient
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Jaz delam malo kilometrov (cca 20-25 k) in sem lani nasedel na prednosti celoletnih gum ter kupil Michelin All Season. Čisto na začetku so bile OK, potem pa vedno slabše, tudi poleti (slab oprijem). Zdaj so pa katastrofa, vsak ovinek se grem kontrolirano oddrsavanje.

Pros: ok at the beginning
Cons: bad grip, catastrophe
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 288

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...