Tires MICHELIN or Firestone

MICHELIN Tires

My first set I bought were Michelin cross climate 2s they were pretty expensive I think like $1,000 for the set but I got like 65-70,000 miles out of them and and probably could have gotten more but I got got an unrepairable flat and just replaced them all.

Pros: long lifespan (65-70k miles)
Cons: expensive
Mileage: 104607 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

X ICE SNOW, I have them on a Mazda SUV, had several German cars but the X ICE snow is a very good tire. It does wear quickly though.

Pros: very good tire
Cons: wears quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Aus meiner Erfahrung und der von einigen Bekannten, sind die Michelin Cross Climate 2 absolute top choice. Das Geld ist gut investiert.

Pros: absolute top choice, good investment
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I usually give Nokians the edge, but Michelin X Ice purchased and installed at Costco is probably the easiest overall ownership experience, especially if you have to warranty anything.

Pros: easy ownership experience
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had these on my 3 but my range took a major hit. They grip very well, but very inefficient.

Pros: excellent grip
Cons: reduced range, inefficient
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I’ve had both the firestones and pilot sports on my corvette. The wet weather grip on the PS is much better. I would fishtail pretty regularly with the firestones. Would not recommend if you plan to drive in the rain.

Cons: poor wet grip, fishtail regularly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 307

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...