Tires MICHELIN or Falken

MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run Michelins on the car in the past(cost me a good $1200 for all 4) but they lasted a long time and had great grip in both the dry and the wet

Pros: lasted a long time, great grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’m a fan of the CC2’s. I have them on all my cars. I did take a 5-10% range hit versus the OEM Conti’s but grip (especially wet & snow) is soooo much better.

Pros: better grip, wet and snow
Cons: 5-10% range hit
Mileage: 36000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

FWIW - I dropped my stock 17” wheels down to 16” Sparco Terra wheels and run Falken Wildpeak Trail tires. Awesome year round and we get a lot of snow in New England.

Pros: awesome year round
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
adrew
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Personally, I would not get the CrossClimates if you are in Florida. They are like a hybrid winter tire with the snowflake and would probably be great in the rain but might wear quickly down there. I put a set (the car version) on our Corolla before we sent it to our kid up north and they were okay but felt a little "clompy" and loud over bumps.

Pros: great in the rain
Cons: clompy and loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

AT3W 100%. My 2016 4x4 Tacoma actually came with new KO2s from the dealer and they were the biggest POS tire ever. Terrible. I would slip in rain all the time it nearly caused a few wrecks. Off-road it was just ok. Meanwhile the falkens felt amazing both on road or off-road , rain or dirt. With a 55k warranty. Best tires I’ve ever owned.

Pros: amazing on/off road, good warranty
Cons: terrible in rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...