Tires Falken or Continental

Continental Tires

The stock kinergys are quite bad new and once they start approaching 1/2 life left, became honestly dangerous in the rain from my experience. I replaced them with Continental Extreme Contact DWS06+’s well before the tires were worn out and haven’t looked back. 100% worth it.

Pros: 100% worth it
Cons: dangerous in the rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

Also I live in the Northeast, around Philly, so I needed something with decent all season traction. Conti has been great. And very good wear rating .

Pros: decent all season traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'm 3k miles in on my 23 pro. 285/75/16's w/ spacers.

The Falken's are quieter.

They gave better grip in wet and icy conditions.

They did result in a very mild mpg hit.

Pros: quieter, better grip
Cons: mild mpg hit
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
MAC
  • Grip:
Rating 3.5

The Advan wheels on my miata came with dws06+. Was really happy with the performance but what annoyed me so much about them was the tapered profile and narrow tread. Wet performance wasn't a concern for that car so I replaced them with the firehawks in the same size. The tread is almost an inch wider and they dont look stretched on the wheels.

Pros: good performance
Cons: tapered profile, narrow tread
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
platywus
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

They are absolutely trash in the snow and for being relatively worn smooth at this point, they have been noisier than anything in 30 years of driving.

Pros: high mileage
Cons: trash in snow, very noisy
Mileage: 70000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 240

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...